#EXFAT VS NTFS SSD FULL#

The exFAT took 118 seconds to export the project, while theВ NTFS tookвЂ¦. I then exported an edited video file using both formats. TheВ NTFS took 130 seconds to move them over while the exFAT was only 107 seconds.

#EXFAT VS NTFS SSD FULL#

I grabbed a 11.2 GB folder full of various video files and project files and copied it to the drive when it was formatted asВ NTFS and exFAT. There are read/write tests on the web that break all this down, the problem is that it doesnвЂ™t really answer my question for me, it basically says it all depends on the type of files being used (not to mention the people who contradict each other). There is no right size, there are tradeoffs, but for us, it works just fine.ДЇor questions #2, IвЂ™ve always been concerned that I may be limiting my speed when I pick the exFAT format vs. ItвЂ™s the default the computer picks for me and IвЂ™ve read several places where it was at least alluded to being a good size. So when I reformat to exFAT, I typically pick 256 kilobytes for the Allocation unit size. These arenвЂ™t the same!!! 1В kilobyte = 1000 bytes (or 1024 bytes depending on context). First, a lot of people confuse the defaultВ NTFS file size of 4096 bytes with the exFAT option of 4096 kilobytes. Now, the question IвЂ™ve always had was: 1) What allocation unit size should I pick for exFAT? and 2) Am I loosing read/write speed when I pick exFAT over NTFS?ДЇor question #1, doing a Google search gives you some answers, but also leaves you with a lot of head scratching. To do this, we reformat all our drives to exFAT which allows us to read and write to the drives using either a PC or a Mac.

It also means that they need to work on both PCвЂ™s and MacвЂ™s. WeвЂ™re constantly handing projects off to different people to work on different parts and that means these projects need to be mobile. Warning! Technical stuff ahead! We use a lot of external drives for media work and storage.

Exfat vs ntfs ssd